Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings.
By David Lopatto. Cell Biology Education, 2004
956 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5d0fd93c92ab672ceb44740cfdf8bdbf1725309
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- John Willison
- Erin L. Dolan
- Heather Thiry
- S. Laursen
- Deborah Johnson
- A. Hunter
- K. Webber
- Allison BrckaLorenz
In General Health Professions
- Heather Thiry
- David Lopatto
- S. Laursen
- John Willison
- A. Hunter
- Erin L. Dolan
- Deborah Johnson
- Kerry O’Regan
In Safety Research
- John Willison
- Heather Thiry
- Erin L. Dolan
- Deborah Johnson
- S. Laursen
- A. Hunter
- David Lopatto
- K. Webber
Citations in the corpus
- Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. (2007, background): “Figure 1 shows the mean gains for the original survey group (Lopatto, 2004), the mean gains for the current survey group, and the mean gains for the follow-up group.”
- Importance of Undergraduate Research for Minority Persistence and Achievement in Biology (2010, background): “Another survey found racial/ethnic differences to be non-existent in the effects of undergraduate research on plans to pursue postgraduate education in the sciences (Lopatto, 2004).”
- Becoming Researchers: The Participation of Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Scientific Research Groups (2013, background): “We begin with Lopatto (2004), who developed the Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE), which is now in its third form.1 His goals were to determine (a) whether the students’ educational experiences were enhanced, (b) if the UREs attract and support talented students interested in…”
- Toward a Holistic View of Undergraduate Research Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Impact on Graduate/Postdoctoral Mentors (2009, background): “The value of such experiences is noted in the Boyer Commission’s call (1998) for the promotion of undergraduate learning ‘‘based on discovery guided by mentoring rather than on the transmission of information.’’ A growing body of research documents the positive outcomes of research experiences for u”
- Student and Faculty Member Engagement in Undergraduate Research (2013, background): “…and retention (Cole and Espinoza 2008; Ishiyama 2002; Nagda et al. 1998), clarify choice of academic major (Tompkins 1998; Wasserman 2000; Seymour et al. 2004), and promote enrollment in graduate school (Bauer and Bennett 2003; Hathaway et al. 2002; Seymour et al. 2004; Lopatto 2004; Russell 2008).”
- Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report (2014, neutral): “…benefit from research experiences(KremerandBringle,1990;Kardash,2000;Rauck-horst et al ., 2001; Hathaway et al ., 2002; Bauer and Bennett, 2003; Lopatto, 2004, 2007; Lopatto and Tobias, 2010; Seymour etal .,2004;Hunter etal .,2007;Russell etal .,2007;Laursen etal ., 2010; Thiry and Laursen,…”
- A Broadly Implementable Research Course in Phage Discovery and Genomics for First-Year Undergraduate Students (2014, neutral): “The Survey of Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE) and the Classroom Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) measure the students’ assessment of their understanding of science and scientists, confidenceintheirabilitytoperformresearch,andtheirperceived gainsinskills(50).”
- Cross-Discipline Perceptions of the Undergraduate Research Experience (2011, background): “Consistent with Lopatto (2004) and Kardash (2000) female and male researchers reported few differences in general benefits of participation.”
- Ten Salient Practices of Undergraduate Research Mentors: A Review of the Literature (2015, background): “…availability (regular meetings), trustworthiness, capacity for network development beyond their own academic department, and ability to guide students through the research and writing process (Falconer & Holcomb, 2008; Gafney, 2005; Lopatto, 2004; Mekolichick & Gibbs, 2012; Shellito et al., 2001).”