The Protege's Perspective Regarding Negative Mentoring Experiences: The Development of a Taxonomy

By L. Eby, S. McManus, Shana A. Simon, Joyce E. A. Russell. 2000

448 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b57fbd7df8d673ef81f0681342cb04dfdf48acb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. B. R. Ragins
2. L. Eby
3. K. Kram
4. Dawn Chandler
5. Tammy D. Allen
6. Jeffrey Yip
7. M. Butts
8. Angie Lockwood

In Education

1. Tammy D. Allen
2. L. Eby
3. B. R. Ragins
4. K. Kram
5. Dawn Chandler
6. Jeffrey Yip
7. J. Durley
8. Sarah A. Hezlett

In Social Psychology

1. L. Eby
2. K. Kram
3. B. R. Ragins
4. Tammy D. Allen
5. Dawn Chandler
6. Jeffrey Yip
7. M. Butts
8. J. Durley

Citations in the corpus

• A Framework for Conceptualizing Competence to Mentor (2003, background): “…incompetence, poor mentor–protégé matching, neglect or abandonment of protégés, conflict, boundary violations, exploitation, illegal or unethical behavior, unresolved cross-race or cross-gender concerns, or dysfunctional protégé traits or behaviors (Eby et al., 2000; Johnson & Huwe, 2002).”
• Who Is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research (2011, background): “…or explicitly stated some hierarchical difference between the mentor and protégé, some definitions could be interpreted as allowing for a more experienced peer to serve as a mentor (Godshalk & Sosik, 2003), and a few studies specifically included peers as possible mentors (Eby et al., 2000).”
• A Qualitative Examination of Graduate Advising Relationships: The Advisee Perspective. (2003, background): “For example, Schlosser and Gelso (2001) found that 100% of the 281 graduate student respondents indicated that they had an advisor, whereas Cronan-Hillix et al.”
• Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation (2005, background): “In terms of mentoring problems previously identified in the literature we did not find evidence of mentor manipulation or lack of mentor expertise (compare our findings with Eby et al., 2000) or any of the relational problems identified by Eby and McManus (2004) from the mentorÕs perspective.”
• Behavioural indicators of ineffective managerial coaching: a cross-national study. (2008, result): “This is beginning to happen in the coaching-related field of mentoring where the long held contention that mentorships are susceptible to problems has resulted in much discussion and a few recent empirical studies into the emergent concepts of “negative”, “marginal” and “dysfunctional” mentoring rel”
• Educational mentoring: Is it worth the effort? (2003, methodology): “However, a comparison of the two databases may not be justified as the Eby et al (2000) data came from participants in two executive development programs and the database used in this study arose from an examination of educational studies.”
• MENTORING RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND DYNAMIC PROCESS MODEL (2003, background): “While these categorizations are helpful, since both studies found that over 50% of the participants reported having at least one negative experience or relationship at some time point (Eby et al., 2000; Kalbfleisch, 1997), they are only a starting point and research examining the antecedents and the”