Who Is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research

By Dana L. Haggard, Thomas W. Dougherty, D. Turban, J. Wilbanks. 2011

488 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ded506dbc9a1c552a2d221364daa7b90ed586ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Developing Attitudes Toward an Entrepreneurial Career Through Mentoring (2015, background): “4 present, as proposed by Haggard et al. (2011), three components must be present: there must be a reciprocal relationship with development benefits for the mentee, especially career-related benefits, as well as regular and substantial interaction with a long-term perspective.”
A Review of Developmental Networks (2012, methodology): “…traditional mentoring literature (Allen & Eby, 2007; Allen, Eby, O’Brien, & Lentz, 2008; Haggard, Dougherty, Turban, & Wilbanks, 2011; Kammeyer-Mueller & Judge, 2008; Ragins & Kram, 2007) and called for increased attention to developmental networks in future research (e.g., Haggard et al., 2011).”
An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects (2011, background): “We agree with Haggard et al.’s (2011) assessment that the literature should acknowledge many definitions rather than assert one is better than others; what is therefore critical is that researchers are clear about what definition drives their work so that studies’”
The Wheel Model of humor: Humor events and affect in organizations (2012, background): “counseling), and both types of support result in objective and subjective benefits to protégés (Allen et al., 2004; Haggard et al., 2011).”
Mapping a Mentoring Roadmap and Developing a Supportive Network for Strategic Career Advancement (2017, background): “Finding effective mentors that are not in the same physical location is becoming increasingly plausible (Haggard et al., 2011).”
Informal Mentoring at Work: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2016, unknown): “Again, SDT could be helpful for studying both members’ motives to engage in mentoring C© 2015 British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. relationships (Haggard et al. 2011; Janssen et al. 2014).”