Team Performance and Satisfaction: A Link to Cognitive Style Within a Process Framework

By M. Basadur, Milena M. Head. 2001

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1ea275b4cf4c65d55b721f5bc679fc3911cfd2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Creative Problem-Solving Process Styles, Cognitive Work Demands, and Organizational Adaptability (2014, background): “Basadur and Head (2001) reported an experiment in which teams with a mix of styles significantly out-performed teams whose members all had the same style in innovative work.”
So You’re Thinking of Trying Problem Based Learning?: Three Critical Success Factors for Implementation (2004, background): “Recently, Basadur and Head (2001) reported research that indicates that heterogeneous teams (someone from each quadrant) outperform both complete (all members from the same quadrant) and partial (all members from two quadrants) homogenous teams.”
Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups (2010, background): “The relationship between diversity and satisfaction has generally been found to be negative (e.g., Basadur & Head, 2001).”
The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox (2011, background): “Prior research has demonstrated that heterogeneity in team members’ cognitive styles is associated with higher levels of innovation and lower levels of satisfaction (Basadur & Head, 2001; Bilton, 2007).”
Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership (2004, background): “Basadur and Head (2001) showed that teams with more heterogeneous preferences for various phases or stages of the creative process were more innovative than teams whose members were more homogeneous in preference for stages of the creative process.”