The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox

By Ella Miron-Spektor, Miriam Erez, Eitan Naveh. 2011

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2c787a7a6ed23f6649e219f90a3aa28c20ce9fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Managing the Innovation Adoption of Supply Chain Finance-Empirical Evidence From Six European Case Studies (2013, neutral): “2010) and advice from cross-functional teams (Miron-Spektor et al. 2011).”
Different Strokes for Different Teams: The Contingent Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on the Creativity of Informationally Homogeneous and Diverse Teams (2017, background): “Yet the same research suggests that their effects are mixed (Miron-Spektor et al., 2011) and the theoretical arguments for their effectiveness often center around their potential to elicit and Knippenberg, 2017).”
Understanding, differentiating, and measuring opportunity recognition and opportunity exploitation (2017, neutral): “The concept of originality is strongly associated with the concepts of innovativeness and creativity (Miron-Spektor et al., 2011).”
Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? (2018, background): “…depending on team members’ cognitive style, i.e., whether the team contains members that are creative, conformist, and/or attentive to detail, etc. Miron-Spektor et al. (2011) find that creative team members are essential for team radical innovation, while attentive-to-detail members had a…”
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, background): “The authors found that including a balance of both creative and conformist members on a team enhanced its radical innovation (characterized as developing something completely new), whereas including a higher proportion of attentive-to-detail members hindered radical innovation (Miron-spektor et al.,”