Team effectiveness under stress: a structural contingency approach

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity (2013, background): “…and that members of the same team are typically exposed to similar if not the same stressors, they process them in the same manner, and they display similar responses (Drach-Zahavy & Freund, 2007; Ellis, 2006; Torrance, 1954), researchers have started to consider them also as team level phenomena.”
Workplace team resilience: A systematic review and conceptual development (2020, background): “Past research suggests that psychological safety (i.e., a team’s shared belief to be safe to take interpersonal risks; Edmondson, 1999) is an important prerequisite for effective reflection processes (Drach-Zahavy & Freund, 2007).”
Team Self-Managing Behaviors and Team Effectiveness: The Moderating Effect of Task Routineness (2010, methodology): “Finally, instead of adopting a universalistic approach, this study relies on a structural contingency approach (e.g., Drach-Zahavy & Freund, 2007; Hollenbeck et al., 2002) to examine the relationship between team members’ self-managing behaviors and team effectiveness.”