Growth Models of Developmental Language Disorders

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of input on the early grammatical development of bilingual children (2010, background): “Although maturational views leave some room for experience-related (Wexler, 1998: 26) and environmental factors (Rice, 2004: 231), their prediction would be that effects of input quantity are rather minimal, and certainly less pronounced than predicted by input-based accounts.”
Defining language phenotypes in autism (2006, background): “In more recent studies, [23] reported that by age 8, most children with SLI have finally caught up with their unimpaired peers who had mastered tense morphology by age 4.”
The interface between bilingual development and specific language impairment (2010, background): “LPC theories seek to derive a wide range of linguistic and nonlinguistic outcomes of SLI from lower level, domain-general deficits alone, in contrast to the maturational model put forward by Rice (2004), which posits the presence of additional domain-specific deficits in SLI.”
Cognitive correlates of vocabulary growth in English language learners (2011, background): “Three longitudinal studies modeled trajectories of vocabulary development in English-speaking children and adolescents with or without language impairment (Beitchman et al. 2008; Law, Tomblin, & Zhang, 2008; Rice 2004).”