Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing
By Lauren B. Resnick, R. Rothman, Jean B. Slattery, Jennifer Vranek. 2004
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1af1d2a623c6b9b2f22283c6177592c1c9dc654
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- S. Sireci
- Stephen N. Elliott
- A. Martone
- John Smithson
- S. Zuniga
- Gwendolyn M. Lloyd
- J. Wehby
- J. Herman
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the alignment among curriculum, instruction, and assessments: Implications and applications for research and practice (2008, methodology): “As noted by Resnick et al. (2003), tests should ideally feature items that run the whole gamut of challenge from simple tasks on accessible concepts to complex tasks on challenging concepts.”
- Alignment of the Intended, Planned, and Enacted Curriculum in General and Special Education and Its Relation to Student Achievement (2010, background): “The majority of alignment studies up to now have focused on the alignment between standards and assessments (e.g., Resnick et al., 2003; Webb, 1997a, 1997b, 1999; Webb, Herman, & Webb, 2006), a trend largely attributable to the extensive accountability and testing requirements of standards-based…”
- Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction (2009, methodology): “Although the 1C rating was not present in the earlier description of the methodology (Resnick et al., 2004; Rothman et al., 2002), it was added in the Achieve, Inc., 2006 study and provides a helpful additional point of analysis.”
- Empathy Training: Methods, Evaluation Practices, and Validity (2011, methodology): “…treatment content and measurement content is akin to the method of examining alignment among standards, curricular and exam contents for assessing curricular validity of test scores or effectiveness of curriculum materials or standards (Beck, 2007; Resnick, Rothman, Slattery & Vranek, 2004).”
- Measurement Issues in the Alignment of Standards and Assessments (2007, methodology): “…L. Webb, systematic procedures for assessing alignment have been well developed (Ananda, 2003; Bhola, Impara, & Buckendahl, 2003; Herman, Webb, & Zuniga, 2003; Olson, 2003; Porter & Smithson, 2001; Rothman et al., 2002; Webb, 1997, 2002) and now are being applied in states across the country.”
- Strategic Compromise a Student Teacher's Design of Kindergarten Mathematics Instruction in a High-Stakes Testing Climate (2007, background): “Nonetheless, like teachers described in previous studies and reports (e.g., Barksdale-Ladd & Thomas, 2000; Rothman et al., 2002), Bridget received strong messages from the administration and other teachers about Walnut Street’s expectations for her mathematics instruction.”