Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using School Mission Statements for Reflection and Research (2011, background): “In the wake of the NCLB Act, many educational research studies have focused on the alignment of assessment with instruction (e.g., Martone & Sireci, 2009; Roach et al., 2008); however, few studies have taken direct aim at systematically and empirically investigating the larger objectives of formal…”
Common Core Standards (2011, methodology): “The SEC approach to calculating alignment is recognized for its ability to compare any two documents of content standards, assessments, curriculum materials, and instructional practices (Martone & Sireci, 2009).”
How Well Aligned Are State Assessments of Student Achievement With State Content Standards? (2011, methodology): “There are three primary methods for establishing the coherence (alignment) of standards and assessments (for a complete review, see Martone & Sireci, 2009; Porter, 2006).”
Changing “Course” (2014, background): “One major difference between the intended curriculum and the experienced curriculum is that the latter can be more difficult to measure (Martone and Sireci, 2009).”