A Meta-Analysis of Gender Group Differences for Measures of Job Performance in Field Studies
By Philip L. Roth, K. Purvis, Philip Bobko. 2012
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b140898336d9b4d876be84601aa88bf50bc9dc55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- K. Badura
- Daniel A. Newman
- Anyi Ma
- Ashleigh Shelby Rosette
- Gahyun Jeon
- R. Livingston
- T. Yan
- C. Koval
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- K. Badura
- Daniel A. Newman
- Anyi Ma
- Ashleigh Shelby Rosette
- Krishna Savani
- R. Livingston
- Zhiyu Feng
- C. Koval
In Sociology and Political Science
- K. Badura
- Daniel A. Newman
- Anyi Ma
- Ashleigh Shelby Rosette
- Gahyun Jeon
- Krishna Savani
- R. Livingston
- T. Yan
Citations in the corpus
- Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men (2017, background): “For example, Roth and colleagues’ meta-analysis of such studies, encompassing 45,733 participants, found that while women tend to receive better job performance ratings than men, women also tend to be passed up for promotion [25].”
- Gender and leadership emergence: A meta‐analysis and explanatory model (2018, methodology): “29]), existing research has shown that on average women tend to have higher levels of job performance than men (δ = −.11; k = 61; N = 45,733; Roth et al., 2012).”
- Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties (2016, background): “In a metaanalysis that examined performance ratings in field studies, Roth, Purvis, and Bobko (2012) found that performance evaluations favored women but that promotability judgments favored men.”
- How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Job Performance: The Mediating Roles of Goal Congruence and Psychological Capital (2014, unknown): “More specifically, a recent meta-analysis showed that females, on average, were rated as performing better than males (Roth et al. 2012).”
- Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: implications for dual-career parents working from home (2020, background): “However, the research has documented little to no gender differences in work outcomes such as work productivity and job satisfaction (Aryee et al., 2005; Banerjee and Perrucci, 2010; Bönte and Krabel, 2014; Robb andWatson, 2012; Roth et al., 2012; Westover, 2012).”