Evaluation Practice Reconsidered

By Thomas A. Schwandt. 2002

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afdded51c6a9303b0ccee7bb15b7a2a14c537be2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Susan Mowbray
2. Douglas H. Clements
3. C. Halse
4. Julie Sarama
5. C. Weiland
6. Christopher B. Wolfe
7. M. Blanton
8. H. Yoshikawa

Citations in the corpus

• Cur r iculum Resear ch : Tow ar d a Fr amew or k for "Resear ch -based Cur r icula" (2007, background): “Although the recent hermeneutic trend in the field of evaluation are valuable and complementary, the logic of practical wisdom (Schwandt, 2002), which rejects evaluating a published curriculum as defined here and focuses only on " lived human practice, " " embraces the inherent ambiguity of life, "…”
• The purpose of the PhD: theorising the skills acquired by students (2010, methodology): “…technical instrumentalisation in theorising management practices and professional expertise (Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1980; Gadamer, 1984; Kemmis, 2005; Schwandt, 2002), ethical practice (Crisp & Slote, 1997; MacIntyre, 2007), the social sciences (Eikeland, 2008; Flyvbjerg, 2004; Greenwood & Levin,…”