Different Hats, Different Obligations: Plural Occupational Identities and Situated Moral Judgments

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The moral self: A review and integration of the literature (2015, background): “In terms of moral content, morality is culturally relative and particularistic to certain societies, institutions, communities, and organizations (Hunter, 2000; Leavitt et al., 2012).”
Egoistic norms, organizational identification, and the perceived ethicality of unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moral maturation perspective (2020, background): “Supporting this contention, occupation-specific identities have been found to influence how individuals make ethical judgments related to particular contexts (Leavitt et al., 2012).”
From Synchronizing to Harmonizing: The Process of Authenticating Multiple Work Identities (2018, background): “Even within the workplace, where identity complexity is becoming more prevalent, organizations are often requiring that individuals take on multiple or even hybrid work roles, such as being nurse-managers (Caza and Creary, 2016) or army medics (Leavitt et al., 2012).”
The Impact of Role Identities on Entrepreneurs’ Evaluation and Selection of Opportunities (2017, background): “…suggests, role identities carry expectations for distinct behaviors and actions (Ashforth, 2001) and individuals take on many role identities within the context of work (Leavitt et al., 2012), then we might expect a variety of distinct behaviors and actions within an entrepreneur’s work life.”