Epistemological resources and framing: a cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students' epistemologies
By Andrew Elby, David M. Hammer. 2010
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9c016db5b8aea2c26db6456a5f65b3082812e88
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
- Clark A. Chinn
- William A. Sandoval
- Ivar Bråten
- Sarit Barzilai
- J. Lunn Brownlee
- Florian C. Feucht
- Brian J. Reiser
In Education
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
- Clark A. Chinn
- William A. Sandoval
- Ivar Bråten
- Sarit Barzilai
- Brian J. Reiser
- J. Lunn Brownlee
- Leila E. Ferguson
Citations in the corpus
- Engineering Students' Epistemological Views on Mathematical Methods in Engineering (2015, background): “Instead, they offer a cognitive resource model, in which they define cognitive resources as “fine-grained knowledge elements” or “mini-generalizations” that “a student possesses, the activation of which depends on context” (Elby & Hammer, 2010, p. 410).”
- Moving Beyond Reflection: Reflexivity and Epistemic Cognition in Teaching and Teacher Education (2017, background): “Other frameworks which have also moved the field beyond developmental traditions include Barbara Hofer’s (2004a) Epistemological Theories and Elby and Hammer’s (2010)”
- Identifying Essential Epistemic Heuristics for Guiding Mechanistic Reasoning in Science Learning (2018, methodology): “However, we also use the term heuristics to signal something more specific than the epistemic frames typically described in the literature (e.g., memorizing things vs. sensemaking; Elby & Hammer, 2010; Rosenberg, Hammer, & Phelan, 2006).”
- Understanding and Promoting Thinking About Knowledge (2016, background): “On the other hand, many authors from a disciplinary education background have argued that epistemic cognition should be studied in authentic practice contexts, such as when students conduct experiments or construct models (Elby & Hammer, 2010; Kelly, 2016; Sandoval, 2005).”
- Changing Teachers' Epistemic Cognition: A New Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Reflexivity (2017, background): “First, disciplinary studies have offered insight into the situated nature of epistemic cognition (Elby & Hammer, 2010).”
- On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance (2018, background): “…epistemic beliefs (e.g., Kienhues, Ferguson, & Stahl, 2016; Muis & Duffy, 2013), practical epistemologies (Sandoval, 2005), epistemological frames (Elby & Hammer, 2010), epistemologies in practice (Berland et al., 2015), understanding of the nature of science (e.g., Abd-El-Khalick, 2013), and…”