Psychological success: When the career is a calling
By D. Hall, Dawn Chandler. 2005
1,200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a92b95fedff0b2f29d0ad12957e5fb778ce48162
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Bryan J. Dik
- Ryan D. Duffy
- Peter A. Creed
- Michelle Hood
- Anna Praskova
- A. Hirschi
- M. Steger
- Anne Herrmann
In Health
- Bryan J. Dik
- Ryan D. Duffy
- Michelle Hood
- Peter A. Creed
- Anna Praskova
- A. Hirschi
- Anne Herrmann
- M. Steger
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- A. Hirschi
- Ryan D. Duffy
- Bryan J. Dik
- Peter A. Creed
- Michelle Hood
- Anna Praskova
- Anne Herrmann
- Jos Akkermans
Citations in the corpus
- The nomological network of self-management strategies and career success (2008, background): “In fact, Hall and Chandler (2005) outlined a number of examples to demonstrate when objective success does not lead to psychological success.”
- Relational and Identity Perspectives on Healthy Versus Unhealthy Pursuit of Callings (2012, background): “As much of the research on callings has focused on workers’ views of the work itself (Dik & Duffy, 2009; Duffy & Sedlacek, 2007; Hall & Chandler, 2005; Wrzesniewski, 2003), enhancing an understand of how callings might affect one’s relationships with others and their organization offers an expanded…”
- Job demands, job resources and meaning at work (2011, background): “), thus reflecting the psychological attachment of individuals towards their specific work tasks (see Hall and Chandler, 2005”
- Antecedents and Outcomes of Objective Versus Subjective Career Success: Competing Perspectives and Future Directions (2018, background): “…to relate insights from quantitative empirical research to seminal conceptual, qualitative, and review articles on the antecedents and outcomes of career success (e.g., Arthur et al., 2005; Duff & Chan, 2014; Feldman & Ng, 2007; Gunz & Heslin, 2005; Hall & Chandler, 2005; Heslin et al., in press).”
- Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration (2009, methodology): “Writing on the protean career has tended to emphasize the “winners” in today’s changing workplace (Baruch & Quick, 2007; Hall, 1996a), such as individuals who find their true calling (i.e., the work they are destined to do; Hall & Chandler, 2005) or form a new working identity (Ibarra, 2003).”
- How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time (2009, background): “The revers ed irectio no fi nfluence –t hat the subjective experience of success leads to more objective success –i sa lso conceivable (Boeh m& Lyubomirsky ,2 008; Hall, 2002 ) .S ubjective success could mak ea person self-confident, it could enhance his/her motivation and goal-striving, and these ”
- When Callings Are Calling: Crafting Work and Leisure in Pursuit of Unanswered Occupational Callings (2010, background): “Whereas the dominant view in existing research is that callings are psychologically pleasant experiences (e.g., Hall and Chandler 2005, Heslin 2005, Wrzesniewski et al. 1997), our research suggests that individuals may experience mixed or ambivalent emotions (Fong 2006, Pratt 2000) in pursuing…”
- Career identity and the complex mediating relationships between career preparatory actions and career progress markers (2015, background): “Individuals with a stronger calling engage in more exploration (Hall & Chandler, 2005; Zikic & Hall, 2009) and are more motivated, proactive, and self-directed in planning, developing, and implementing their career (Duffy, Bott, Allan, Torrey, & Dik, 2012; Hall & Chandler, 2005).”
- Family and career path characteristics as predictors of women’s objective and subjective career success: Integrating traditional and protean career explanations (2008, background): “The notion of identity as a key influence in career success is foundational in the protean career literature (Hall, 2002; Hall & Chandler, 2005).”
- Do psychological contracts include boundaryless or protean careers (2006, background): “In response to this uncertainty, some career scholars claim that employees have developed boundaryless careers that are independent of organizational boundaries or protean careers in which a career is seen as development of the self (Arthur et al., 2005; Arthur and Rousseau, 1996; Sullivan, 1999; Ha”