Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations.

By Karl Aquino, T. M. Tripp, R. Bies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006

721 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a58dc337a4c19cc1f0a21fa20c4d55aafdbb46d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Benefits, Costs, and Paradox of Revenge (2010, background): “Victims of lower status may also find it more advantageous to maintain a relationship with a higher-status transgressor, thus motivating more constructive coping responses than revenge (Aquino et al., 2006).”
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies (2017, background): “punishment (Aquino et al., 2006) and this could inhibit a combative reciprocal response”
Eyes Wide Open: Perceived Exploitation and Its Consequences (2019, background): “…distress (Spencer & Myers, 2006), often followed by the emotional response of anger and hostility, which allows the relief of such distress (Aquino et al., 2006) essentially through the rejection of the diminishing treatment and the preservation of one’s self-respect via selfempowerment…”
We're All Victims Here: Toward a Psychology of Revenge (2008, background): “Aquino, Tripp, and Bies (2006) found that when interpersonal transgressions take place in contexts that do not offer an effective formal procedure for resolving conflicts (which they defined as the procedural justice climate), victims may then decide to seek justice on their own by taking revenge…”
Moving from Abuse to Reconciliation: A Power-Dependence Perspective on When and How a Follower Can Break the Spiral of Abuse (2017, background): “Unfortunately, the leader’s effort to mend strained leader–follower relationships does not follow naturally after abuse (Andiappan & Trevino, 2010; Aquino et al., 2006).”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, positive): “Thus, employees who experience abusive supervision can directly express their aggression to the supervisor by engaging in deviant behaviors, even though the behaviors may result in lost rewards, punishment, or counter-retaliation (Aquino et al. 2006; Tepper et al. 2009).”
Consumer revenge behavior: A cross-cultural perspective (2009, positive): “, Bradfield and Aquino, 1999; Aquino et al., 2006; Stuckless and Goranson, 1992, etc.) and there are reasons for questioning their relevance for non-Western cultures. For instance, although Bechwati and Morrin (2003) found that interactional and procedural unfairness are strong predictors of a consu”
Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. (2007, background): “Aquino, Tripp, and Bies (2006) demonstrated that lower level individuals are more likely to seek revenge than higher level individuals.”
When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims' self-construals facilitates forgiveness (2010, background): “For instance, Aquino, Tripp, and Bies (2006) demonstrated a strong positive correlation between forgiveness and relationship repair among coworkers at a public utility company.”
A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power (2010, background): “Based on the workplace literature (Aquino et al. 2006; Tripp et al., 2007), we suggest that low-power customers are reluctant to engage in direct revenge because of a fear of counter-retaliation.”