When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims' self-construals facilitates forgiveness
By Ryan Fehr, Michele J. Gelfand. 2010
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b1d6965ea2094fcd2d28d0122ba8cb44b96cfca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The nature of an apology: An experimental study on how to apologize after a service failure (2013, background): “Apologies refer to messages containing acknowledgements of blameworthiness for negative events, which can include expressions of remorse (Fehr and Gelfand 2010; Tedeschi and Norman 1985).”
- An Exploration of the Structure of Effective Apologies (2016, background): “For instance, Fehr and Gelfand (2010) argued that an apology is most effective when its contents match with the victim’s specific type of self-construal—independent, relational, or collective.”