Investigating the Underlying Structure of the Citizenship Performance Domain

By V. Coleman, W. C. Borman. 2000

533 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a585c3f536dcac9a21bb0b194db6004b898d8ea0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

What Is Wrong With Treating Followers Differently? The Basis of Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation Matters (2018, background): “The nine items of this scale correspond to aspects of OCB-individual (altruism; three items), OCB-organization (voice; two items), and OCB-job (conscientiousness; four items), respectively (Coleman & Borman, 2000).”
Personality predictors of citizenship performance (2001, background): “In general, collectivists are concerned for others and the community, whereas individualists focus on the search for rewards and satisfaction of personal needs (Early, 1989; Parsons and Shils, 1951). Research has shown that collectivists are less likely to engage in social loafing and shirking than ”
Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis (2015, methodology): “Consistent with previous studies, we grouped citizenship by target (Coleman and Borman 2000): directed toward the organization (OCBO; e.g., compliance, conscientiousness, loyalty, obedience, sportsmanship) and toward other individuals (OCBI; e.g., altruism, helping, courtesy, helping, personal…”
The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour (2012, unknown): “Negative and positive emotions were measured with the Job-Related Affective WellBeing Scale (JAWS), developed by Van Katwyk, Fox, Spector, and Kelloway (2000).”
How leaders' emotional displays shape followers' organizational citizenship behavior (2015, background): “The items reflected different aspects involved in OCB, as outlined in the overview by Coleman and Borman (2000).”
Valuing Task and Contextual Performance: Experience, Job Roles, and Ratings of the Importance of Job Behaviors (2003, background): “24 described by Organ (1988) between generalized compliance and altruism, respectively, and a distinction described by Coleman and Borman (2000) between job-task conscientiousness and organizational citizenship.”
The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. (2011, unknown): “We grouped criteria based on the existing literature (Organ et al., 2006; P. M. Podsakoff et al., 2000) into three categories: organization-directed (OCB-O), individual-directed (OCB-I), and change-oriented citizenship (OCB-CH; Coleman & Borman, 2000; Van Dyne et al., 1995).”
Promoting Role Breadth Self-Efficacy Through Involvement, Work Redesign and Training (2003, background): “Although some dimensions of OCB (notably conscientious initiative, Coleman & Borman, 2000) share some common ground in relation to the role that is the focus of RBSE, OCB is about the actual behaviours performed, whereas RBSE is concerned with a person’s perceived capability to perform these tasks…”
The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. (2005, unknown): “…who demonstrate individual initiative are those who come in early or stay late, check back with the office while on vacation, take work home with them, and volunteer to take on responsibilities that are not part of their own job (e.g., Coleman & Borman, 2000; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, & Hui, 1993).”
Employee positive moods as a mediator linking transformational leadership and employee work outcomes (2009, methodology): “84) obtained from Coleman and Borman's ( 2000 ) scale were used to measure this construct.”
Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. (2001, background): “However, although not represented in the empirical literature (Coleman & Borman, 1999), conceptual descriptions of contextual performance include behaviors like voice.”