Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable
By Jeffrey D. Facteau, S. Bartholomew Craig. 2001
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1686884bd3996aad2d513259d7688410b7aa09d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- T. Beauregard
- Beatrice van der Heijden
- Jennifer S. Mueller
- B. P. Ellen
- O. Epitropaki
- Gerald R. Ferris
- C. V. D. Heijde
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- B. P. Ellen
- Beatrice van der Heijden
- O. Epitropaki
- Gerald R. Ferris
- Anastasia Ntotsi
- Konstantinos Drivas
- I. Kapoutsis
- T. Beauregard
Citations in the corpus
- Why individuals in larger teams perform worse (2012, background): “Research has shown that peer ratings are valid measures of performance (Beehr, Ivanitskaya, Hansen, Erofeev, & Gudanowski, 2001; Campion, Papper, & Medsker, 1996; Facteau & Craig, 2001; Furnham & Stringfield, 1998; Hoegl & Gemuenden, 2001).”
- Navigating uneven terrain : the roles of political skill and LMX differentiation in prediction of work relationship quality and work outcomes. (2016, methodology): “A consistent finding in the performance evaluation literature is that the ratings obtained from different sources do not converge (e.g., Facteau & Craig, 2001; Harris & Schaubroeck, 1988).”
- A competence‐based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability (2006, methodology): “This requirement is not met (see Table II), owing to the greater method variance (Facteau & Craig, 2001).”
- Perfectionism, self-efficacy and OCB: the moderating role of gender (2012, result): “Although research on self-reported performance suggests that it is comparable to ratings from other sources (Facteau and Craig, 2001), and that self-report data are a useful means of measuring employees’ perceptions (Spector, 1994), it may have been preferable to obtain independent ratings of OCB ra”