Adult attachment styles in the workplace

By P. D. Harms. 2011

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e99e1dad853cf16243479271b11b768b4be6571

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The neuropsychology of consumer behavior and marketing (2018, methodology): “Crucially, the study used a three- way interaction between each of three candidate genes, DRD4, catechol- O- methyltransferase (COMT), and the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR), adult psychological attachment styles (avoidant, anxious, or secure; Harms, 2011), and job stress.”
Authentic Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Attachment Insecurity (2015, background): “Although this theory, as a ‘‘grand theory’’, has received much attention in personality research, it has received scant attention from researchers investigating the role of individual differences at workplace (Harms 2011).”
Attachment theory at work: A review and directions for future research (2018, background): “Organizational researchers have since illustrated that employees' attachment styles have the capacity to influence a variety of work‐related attitudes and behaviors (for prior reviews, see Harms, 2011).”
Attachment styles at work: Measurement, collegial relationships, and burnout (2015, background): “Harms (2011) described consistent patterns of social relationships associated with attachment styles.”
Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships (2014, background): “While attachment theory has been applied in leadership research, many implications of attachment theory for the field of leadership have yet to be explored (Harms, 2011).”
Leading to Stimulate Employees' Ideas: A Quantitative Review of Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Voice, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior (2017, background): “LMX s foundation in attachment-style relationships (Harms, 2011; Richards & Hackett, 2012) is likely to be a key explanatory mechanism of the relationships found between LMX and the three outcomes.”
Attachment and emotion regulation: Compensatory interactions and leader–member exchange (2012, background): “Finally, attachment styles are differentiated both theoretically and empirically from personality (Harms, 2011).”