Proactive career behaviors and subjective career success: The moderating role of national culture
By Adam Smale, Silvia Bagdadli, Rickey A. Cotton, Silvia Dello Russo, M. Dickmann, Anders Dysvik, M. Gianecchini, Robert Kaše, M. Lazarova, A. Reichel and 2 more. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2018
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Although career proactivity has positive consequences for an individual's career success, studies mostly examine objective measures of success within single countries. This raises important questions about whether proactivity is equally beneficial for different aspects of subjective career success, and the extent to which these benefits extend across cultures. Drawing on Social Information Processing theory, we examined the relationship between proactive career behaviors and two aspects of subjective career success—financial success and work-life balance—and the moderating role of national culture. We tested our hypotheses using multilevel analyses on a large-scale sample of 11,892 employees from 22 countries covering nine of GLOBE's 10 cultural clusters. Although we found that proactive career behaviors were positively related to subjective financial success, this relationship was not significant for work-life balance. Furthermore, career proactivity was relatively more important for subjective financial success in cultures with high in-group collectivism, high power distance, and low uncertainty avoidance. For work-life balance, career proactivity was relatively more important in cultures characterized by high in-group collectivism and humane orientation. Our findings underline the need to treat subjective career success as a multidimensional construct and highlight the complex role of national culture in shaping the outcomes of career proactivity.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a0caca8c5548d2386362444782426fc0be3aa63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Contemporary career orientations and career self-management: A review and integration (2021, background): “…a historical overview of the career self-management and retirement literature Note: aas of May 18th 2020; Other recently highly cited papers include Briscoe et al. (2012), Jung and Takeuchi (2018), Penn and Lent (2019), and Smale et al. (2019); summary of review results: 8 (54”