Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education.

By J. Maxwell. 2008

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e6cb4158134a26c570a09cbf6718328f41c30ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Citations in the corpus

Aligning assessment with long‐term learning (2006, background): “These will need to include what might have previously, and desirably, been in the domain of informal experiences (cf. in peer learning Boud et al., 2001; Falchikov, 2001).”
Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback (2006, methodology): “PA can, to a certain extent, be understood as a type of collaborative learning (Falchikov, 2001). Compared to collaborative, cooperative, or peer learning*/in all of which students produce a collective outcome, share knowledge and learn from the collaboration*/PA is generally more limited, requiring”
Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students’ metacognitive knowledge and regulation (2012, background): “supervision session was organised (Falchikov, 2001; Parr & Townsend, 2002).”
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment (2006, background): “Peer assessment is defined as students grading the work or performance of their peers using relevant criteria (Falchikov, 2001).”
Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work (2011, background): “Researchers have also hypothesized that students’ discomfort and negativity can be traced to the problematic power relations that students associate with assessing their peers (Falchikov 2001; Liu and Carless 2006; Smith et al. 2002).”
Collaboration in Learning and Teaching Statistics (2008, methodology): “For excellent reviews of these methods see O’Donnell (2006), Boud, Cohen, and Sampson (2001), and Falchikov (2001).”
Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice (2007, background): “A comprehensive review is beyond the scope of this paper and other authors have reviewed this topic well (Ten Cate et al. 1984; Whitman 1988; Topping 1996; Falchikov 2001).”