Interpersonal emotion regulation.

By Jamil Zaki, W. C. Williams. Emotion, 2013

988 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e5d7405ece81f0ac9fcb4574e53bf0c827e9ad7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotion Regulation Flexibility (2014, background): “…to different situations that vary in critical affective dimensions, such as emotional valence (e.g., Mauss et al. 2011), motivation (e.g., Carver and Scheier 1998; Tamir et al. 2008; Gable and Harmon-Jones 2011) and interpersonal context (e.g., Marroquin 2011; Zaki and Williams 2013; Hofmann 2014).”
Contagious leaders and followers: Exploring multi-stage mood contagion in a leader activation and member propagation (LAMP) model (2013, background): “This process has been compared to the rapid and expansive spread of ‘‘wildfires’’ (Saavedra, 2008) because an intense affective episode can spread to more than 50 members of a social network within just a few hours (Rimé, 2007).”
Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects (2015, background): “…emotion regulation has been a particular focus in the developmental literature (e.g., in parent–child interactions), although it is also of growing interest in the adult literature as well (Bloch, Haase, & Levenson, 2014; Levenson, Haase, Bloch, Holley, & Seider, 2014; Zaki & Williams, 2013).”
Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization (2018, background): “When people discuss positive events with others, their goal is to sustain, prolong, or augment these positive emotions (Rimé, 2007), and perhaps also to strengthen their relationship with responders.”
The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online (2019, background): “…group identity from threat, they may be instrumentally upregulating their emotional state (see Goldenberg et al., 2016, p. 128) or expression to motivate other group members to participate in the outrage expression that will further diminish the out-group’s image (see also Zaki & Williams, 2013).”
Interpersonal instrumental emotion regulation (2015, background): “According to Zaki and Williams (2013), decreasing unpleasant emotions or increasing pleasant emotions in others makes people (i.e., the regulators) feel better.”
Current Emotion Research in Social Psychology: Thinking About Emotions and Other People (2015, background): “As Zaki and Williams (2013) argue, distinguishing different forms of interpersonal emotion regulation may help us to understand the links with related areas of research, such as social support seeking and receipt (e.g., Bolger & Amarel, 2007), corumination (e.g., Rose, Carlson, & Waller, 2007), and…”
Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and Processes (2015, background): “As a result of this cascading process, emotions can spread from small groups of people to large groups of 866 † The Academy of Management Annals D ow nl oa de d by [ W hu K ob le nz ] at 0 3: 43 2 2 Se pt em be r 20 15 people (Rimé, 2007b; Rimé & Christophe, 1997).”
Catastrophe Compassion: Understanding and Extending Prosociality Under Crisis (2020, background): “recruit supportive behavior and regulate their emotions through social interactions, for instance “buffering” their stress during difficult times [37-39].”
Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, positive): “Another, less common, approach to interpersonal ER (as depicted in Table 1) is to consider how intrinsic and extrinsic ER processes might co-occur within a relationship (e.g. Campos et al. 2011; Rimé 2007, 2009; Zaki and Williams 2013), a truly interpersonal-level approach.”
The Interpersonal Functions of Empathy: A Relational Perspective (2017, background): “Such personally relevant contexts are, more often than not, interpersonal in nature, resulting in the emotions of one person influencing those of another in a dynamic, bidirectional fashion (Butler, 2015; Campos et al., 2011; Reeck et al., 2016; Zaki & Williams, 2013).”
Emotion in sport: considering interpersonal regulation strategies (2013, background): “Researchers are, however, increasingly recognizing that the emotion process is inherently social and interpersonal (Niven, Totterdell, & Holman, 2009; Parkinson, Fischer, & Manstead, 2005; Rimé, 2006; Van Kleef, 2009).”
Interpersonal Affect Dynamics: It Takes Two (and Time) to Tango (2015, background): “We often explicitly attempt to regulate our partner’s emotional state (Niven, Totterdell, & Holman, 2009; Zaki & Williams, 2013).”
Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience (2015, methodology): “The results of this study thus confirm the data from the three previous studies (Delfosse et al., 2004; Finkenauer & Rimé, 1996; Nils et al., 2005, cited by Rimé, 2007) with a sample whose average age is higher (M ¼ 30, SD ¼ 12.08; Study 1).”
Emotion Regulation: Why Beliefs Matter (2018, background): “Although extrinsic regulation is common (Dixon-Gordon, Bernecker, & Christensen, 2015; Niven, Totterdell, & Holman, 2009; Reeck, Ames, & Ochsner, 2016; Zaki & Williams, 2013), the majority of the emotion regulation literature has focused on intrinsic regulation.”
Empathy: a motivated account. (2014, background): “More recent theories specifically adapt emotion regulation to interpersonal contexts (Coan, 2011; Rimé, 2007; Zaki & Williams, 2013).”