Interpersonal Affect Dynamics: It Takes Two (and Time) to Tango

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Interpersonal Functions of Empathy: A Relational Perspective (2017, background): “Such personally relevant contexts are, more often than not, interpersonal in nature, resulting in the emotions of one person influencing those of another in a dynamic, bidirectional fashion (Butler, 2015; Campos et al., 2011; Reeck et al., 2016; Zaki & Williams, 2013).”
It’s About Time: A Special Section on Affect Dynamics (2015, background): “Butler (2015) starts from this premise and guides us through research that addresses how the emotional worlds of different individuals collide, either by responding to shared circumstances, by responding to each other’s emotions, or by regulating each other’s emotions, and by delineating the dynamic”
Emotion Regulation: Why Beliefs Matter (2018, background): “This creates challenges for examining extrinsic emotion regulation but the theoretical groundwork has begun (Dixon-Gordon et al., 2015; Niven et al., 2009; Reeck et al., 2016; Zaki & Williams, 2013) and the necessary measurement and analysis tools are being developed (e.g., Butler, 2015).”
Modeling Affect Dynamics: State of the Art and Future Challenges (2015, background): “For instance, Butler (2015) discusses the “coconstruction” of emotional meaning, which implies that an individual’s stance towards an event may change after discussing it with other people.”