The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online

By W. Brady, Molly J. Crockett, J. V. Bavel. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2019

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

With more than 3 billion users, online social networks represent an important venue for moral and political discourse and have been used to organize political revolutions, influence elections, and raise awareness of social issues. These examples rely on a common process to be effective: the ability to engage users and spread moralized content through online networks. Here, we review evidence that expressions of moral emotion play an important role in the spread of moralized content (a phenomenon we call moral contagion). Next, we propose a psychological model called the motivation, attention, and design (MAD) model to explain moral contagion. The MAD model posits that people have group-identity-based motivations to share moral-emotional content, that such content is especially likely to capture our attention, and that the design of social-media platforms amplifies our natural motivational and cognitive tendencies to spread such content. We review each component of the model (as well as interactions between components) and raise several novel, testable hypotheses that can spark progress on the scientific investigation of civic engagement and activism, political polarization, propaganda and disinformation, and other moralized behaviors in the digital age.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2c780dbfacc7eb7448cf137a03a5d99761adf84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

  1. Jay J. Van Bavel
  2. Andrea Pereira
  3. Elizabeth Harris
  4. Morgan R. Frank

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Jay J. Van Bavel
  2. Andrea Pereira
  3. Elizabeth Harris
  4. Morgan R. Frank
  5. Joshua A. Tucker
  6. Mark A. Kayser
  7. Michael Peress

Citations in the corpus