Interpersonal instrumental emotion regulation

By Liat Netzer, Gerben A. van Kleef, Maya Tamir. 2015

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa9cea06bf16e0fd461f31baa53632a76a5d5ef6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. H. T. Reis
2. Shelly L. Gable
3. Brett J. Peters
4. Richard M. Ryan
5. Sonja Lyubomirsky
6. M. Demir
7. T. Kashdan
8. Edward L. Deci

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Brett J. Peters
2. H. T. Reis
3. Shelly L. Gable
4. Patti M. Valkenburg
5. Jochen Peter

Citations in the corpus

• Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization (2018, background): “For example, in one study, Netzer, van Kleef, and Tamir (2015) brought participants into the lab to ostensibly play a game with same ‐ sex partners.”
• Why Beliefs About Emotion Matter: An Emotion-Regulation Perspective (2018, unknown): “For example, individuals who believe that a given emotion will be good (i.e., useful) for a social partner to feel are more likely to try to increase that emotion in an interaction partner, even if the emotion is unpleasant (Netzer et al., 2015).”
• Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, unknown): “Extrinsic Interpersonal Emotional Regulation The first broad approach we address is the view of interpersonal ER phenomena in the workplace literature as an extrinsic process, where only another’s emotion is regulated (Gross 2013b; 2015; Little et al. 2012; Netzer et al. 2015; Williams 2007).”