Peer Rejection: Developmental Processes and Intervention Strategies

By H. AndresMartinM.D.M.P.. 2005

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8aaeab51fb39d2e89ab0cf52077f1c840d6f7b81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. K. V. Petrides
2. N. Frederickson
3. N. Humphrey
4. E. Simmonds
5. J. Hebron
6. M. Fraser
7. R. Petrin
8. E. deLara

In Safety Research

1. Nora Arkin
2. R. Petrin
3. E. deLara
4. P. Tolan
5. E. Clark
6. Nicole Godine
7. K. Dodge
8. Dylan L. Robertson

Citations in the corpus

• Why Adolescents Don't Disclose Incidents of Bullying and Harassment (2012, background): “Research indicates that either students do not follow this advice or do not find it effective (Bierman, 2004; Black, Weinles, & Washington, 2010; Davis & Davis, 2005; Unnever & Cornell, 2004).”
• Social Outcomes of Students Who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing in General Education Classrooms (2011, background): “Parents serve as social “coaches” for their children by discussing strategies for making friends or for handling peer problems and by demonstrating competent social interaction with a variety of individuals (Bierman, 2004; Greenberg & Kusche, 1993).”
• Bullying of children and adolescents with autism spectrum conditions: a ‘state of the field’ review (2015, background): “The issues highlighted above in relation to impoverished social experience are a logical next step, given that such interactions feed the development of peer relationships (Bierman 2005).”
• Social Context Influences on Children's Rejection by Their Peers (2010, unknown): “The dominant conceptualization of peer rejection in developmental psychology has focused on the deficits within rejected children that contribute to their social difficulties (see Bierman, 2004).”
• Peer functioning in children with ADHD. (2007, background): “Such reputations are used to defend ongoing exclusion or victimization of rejected children, even if the behaviors that initially led to rejection are no longer present.(20) In addition, negative reputations often become selffulfilling prophecies as rejected children with both social skill deficits ”
• Trait emotional intelligence as a predictor of socioemotional outcomes in early adolescence (2012, background): “In addition to the well-established association between peer rejection and multiple negative outcomes (Bierman, 2004; Rubin et al., 2006), there is increasing evidence that peer relations can have protective effects for at-risk groups of children and adolescents (Barry, Barry, Deming, & Lochman,…”
• Deviant Peer Influences in Intervention and Public Policy for Youth (2006, background): “This rationale guides Alcoholics Anonymous, group intervention for eating disorders with girls (Polivy & Federoff, 1997), social skills training programs (Bierman, 2003), and numerous self-help groups.”
• The Relationship between Personality Traits and Psychological Resilience among the Caribbean Adolescents (2010, background): “This amplified the earlier report that conscientiousness is one of the best predictors of performance in the workplace and conscientious employees are generally more reliable, more motivated, and hard working (Salgado 1997); openness to experience (sometimes called Intellect or Intellect/Imagination”
• Toward an integrated approach to positive development: Implications for intervention (2016, background): “216 development (Bierman, 2004; Elias et al., 1997; Lerner et al., 2002; Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000; Waters & Sroufe, 1983; Zins et al., 2007).”
• Peer Relations of Bullies, Bully-Victims, and Victims: The Two Social Worlds of Bullying in Second-Grade Classrooms (2010, methodology): “While there are multiple ways to analyze sociometric data, the Coie et al. procedures are the standard for classifying distinct status categories (i.e., popular, average, controversial, neglected, rejected) (Bierman, 2004; DeRosier & Thomas, 2003).”
• Aggressive and nonaggressive rejected students : An analysis of their differences (2006, background): “Peer acceptance and peer rejection at school refer to the degree to which students are liked or disliked in their peer group (Asher, 1990; Bierman, 2004).”