Peer Relations of Bullies, Bully-Victims, and Victims: The Two Social Worlds of Bullying in Second-Grade Classrooms
By T. Farmer, R. Petrin, Dylan L. Robertson, M. Fraser, Cristin M. Hall, Steven Day, Kimberly Dadisman. The Elementary school journal, 2010
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b460548662ac4254bd333a317416f5094e983c35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Unique and Interactive Effects of Moral Emotions and Moral Disengagement on Bullying and Defending among School Children (2015, unknown): “…the whole school class to decrease moral disengagement and bullying are important because bullies tend to have popular sociometric status (e.g., Farmer et al., 2010), which might indicate a widespread collective moral disengagement that normalizes, rationalizes, and justifies bullying (see…”
- Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model. (2015, background): “…Österman, & Kaukiainen, 2000; Sutton, Smith, & Swettenham, 1999a, 1999b) and social status (Vaillancourt, Hymel, & McDougall, 2003), with researchers distinguishing between socially integrated and socially marginalized bullies (e.g., Farmer et al., 2010; see Rodkin, Espelage, & Hanish, 2015).”
- Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. (2015, background): “, 2003), leading to distinctions between socially marginalized and socially integrated bullies (Farmer et al., 2010).”