Reconsidering Theoretical Progress in Organizational and Management Research

By J. Edwards. 2010

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8746320ba1fb849ed1dceb0508059d35f5de125b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Play It Again, Sam! An Analysis of Constructive Replication in the Organizational Sciences (2019, background): “370 JAP full text Sinha, Janardhanan, Greer, Conlon, & Edwards (2016) study 2 of study 1 replication or replicate dependent dependent substantial constructive replication”
Using Theory Elaboration to Make Theoretical Advancements (2017, background): “Clearly, there is dissatisfaction with the pace of theoretical progress and a slow pace of progress predicted for the future (Edwards, 2010).”
The Why and How of the Integrative Review (2020, background): “Importantly, the integrative review can also act as a governor on the proliferation of untested theories in organization science (Edwards, 2010), validating some and illuminating flaws in others.”
The elephant in the room of Dynamic Capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together (2012, background): “In this respect, our paper answers the call for efforts to increase theoretical precision in organizational research by reconciling differing conceptual views (Edwards, 2010; Leavitt, Mitchell, and Peterson, 2010).”
Contingency Hypotheses in Strategic Management Research (2012, background): “The use of multitheoretic hypotheses can help to respond to the needs expressed by Edwards (2010).”
Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports (2013, background): “Much attention has recently been given to ways of enriching the theoretical landscape in the organizational sciences (e.g., Corley & Gioia, 2011; Edwards, 2010; Glynn & Rafaelli, 2010).”
The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management (2013, background): “A recently published feature topic in Organizational Research Methods addressed the topic of theoretical progress in organizational and management research (Edwards, 2010).”
From the Editors: Explaining interaction effects within and across levels of analysis (2014, background): “In this way, moderation specifies the conditions under which a given theory applies (or not) and thus increases the precision of theoretical predictions (Edwards, 2010).”
Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: A resource dependence logic (2014, methodology): “In this sense, our study provides a refinement to enhance the precision of the theoretical predictions (Boyd et al., 2012; Edwards, 2010).”
Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, background): “To see whether the questions posed in within-person research facilitate meaningful contributions to the understanding of change over time, we examine the hypotheses in within-person studies as these hypotheses are valuable in (a) specifying expectations related to organizational phenomena, (b) revea”