Using Theory Elaboration to Make Theoretical Advancements
By G. Fisher, Herman Aguinis. 2017
445 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ca1882fa98f67a21e987e45bdfaf357bceb9528
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Gerd J. Hahn
- J. Mackey
- B. P. Ellen
- Charn P. McAllister
- Jack E. Carson
- Kevin J. Murphy
- Herman Aguinis
- Marc Orlitzky
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Gerd J. Hahn
- Kevin J. Murphy
- J. Mackey
- B. P. Ellen
- Charn P. McAllister
- Jack E. Carson
- Herman Aguinis
- Ante Glavas
In Strategy and Management
- Gerd J. Hahn
- J. Mackey
- Charn P. McAllister
- B. P. Ellen
- Jack E. Carson
- Kevin J. Murphy
- Herman Aguinis
- Ana Albuquerque
Citations in the corpus
- Industry 4.0: a supply chain innovation perspective (2020, methodology): “Following a theory elaboration approach (see Fisher and Aguinis 2017), this paper refines the conceptual SCI model specified in Arlbjørn, de Haas, and Munksgaard (2011) to explain the phenomenon of i4.”
- HARKing: How Badly Can Cherry-Picking and Question Trolling Produce Bias in Published Results? (2019, background): “In a nutshell, it is a form of reasoning that attempts to make sense of puzzling facts, as in the case of medical diagnosis, fault diagnosis, and archeological reconstruction, by searching for the simplest and most likely explanation (Fisher & Aguinis, 2017).”
- A Meta-Analysis of Interpersonal and Organizational Workplace Deviance Research (2019, methodology): “…of aspects of a theory to a new context and a deeper understanding of how the elements of a theory vary when applied in a different context” (Fisher & Aguinis, 2017: 445-446), so it enables us to examine the generalizability (i.e., external validity) of research findings across study…”