Contingency Hypotheses in Strategic Management Research

By B. Boyd, Katalin Takacs Haynes, Michael A. Hitt, D. Bergh, Dave J. Ketchen. 2012

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/880e4ea8992029fd7810901b24249a2f5fd9cfe3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. A. Solarino
2. B. Boyd
3. John R. Busenbark
4. Markku V. J. Maula
5. W. Stam
6. Scott D. Graffin
7. Herman Aguinis

In Strategy and Management

1. B. Boyd
2. John R. Busenbark
3. A. Solarino
4. Markku V. J. Maula
5. W. Stam
6. Scott D. Graffin

Citations in the corpus

• A Marginal Effects Approach to Interpreting Main Effects and Moderation (2021, methodology): “We analyzed the years 2011–2018 for Strategic Management Journal to directly follow the time period Boyd et al. (2012) examined, and we selected 2015–2018 for Academy of Management Journal and Journal of Applied Psychology to extend the period Aguinis et al. (2017) investigated.”
• Human Capital and CEO Compensation during Institutional Transitions (2015, unknown): “Thus, theoretically, it is valuable to recognize the heterogeneity among firms, which suggests the usefulness of developing a contingency perspective (Boyd et al., 2012; Filatotchev and Allcock, 2010; Li and Zhang, 2007; Peng and Luo, 2000; Wu et al., 2013).”
• Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility (2019, unknown): “Boyd et al. (2012) argue that direct effects are crucial, but they seem incapable of explaining real world complexities.”
• Ownership of Corporations (2016, background): “Mediated models occur in roughly 5% of strategic management studies (Boyd et al., 2012), and greater use in the ownership area would clearly be beneficial.”
• When do Dynamic Capabilities Lead to Competitive Advantage? The Importance of Strategic Fit (2018, unknown): “Configurational theory suggests the concept of strategic fit (Boyd et al., 2012; Venkatraman, 1989), or ‘matching organizational resources with the corresponding environmental context’ (Ginsberg and Venkatraman, 1985, p. 421).”
• Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research (2019, background): “…for understanding under what conditions a theory’s predictions hold and, thereby, identify the boundaries of the theory (Andersson et al., 2014; Boyd et al., 2012), mediation analyses can be helpful in pinpointing the causal mechanisms that explain why a predictor may influence the criterion…”