The elephant in the room of Dynamic Capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together

By Giada Di Stefano, Margaret A. Peteraf. 2012

647 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0f8c270a3a6fba8ef39ff34d8ca09f008a3695d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Research (2018, background): “(Peteraf et al., 2013: 1407) [Other] Methodsinternal validity “(. . .) we believe our field’s understanding of the temporal processes behind capability development could benefit greatly from longitudinal work that either uses quantitative panel data or is based on an inductive, theorybuilding…”
From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities (2017, background): “However, Peteraf et al. (2013) emphasized the possibility of unifying these contradictory approaches and yet preserving the differing assumptions.”
Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce (2021, background): “…that firms can achieve a competitive advantage by means of (tangible and intangible) resources, which need to be recombined and coordinated through strategic capabilities (e.g., Amit and Schoemaker, 1993; McEvily and Zaheer, 1999) that can be dynamic (Teece and Pisano, 2004; Peteraf et al., 2013).”
Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities (2016, background): “The concept of dynamic capabilities is associated with two main theoretical traditions: the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm and evolutionary theory (Di Stefano et al., 2014; Easterby-Smith et al., 2009; Peteraf et al., 2013).”
The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, positive): “Insert Figure 2 About Here This analysis confirms the split in the DCV identified by Peteraf et al. (2013b).”
When do Dynamic Capabilities Lead to Competitive Advantage? The Importance of Strategic Fit (2018, neutral): “…capabilities and competitive advantage is more complex, and that focusing on environmental dynamism without attention to other relevant factors may paint an incomplete portrait of the value of dynamic capabilities (Fainshmidt et al.,2016; Grant and Bakhru, 2016; Peteraf et al., 2013; Ringov, 2017).”