THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

By R. Dekeyser. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2000

1,284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85897751404eb9dbb2b225716244ec356ba8f277

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kazuya Saito
2. Shaofeng Li
3. Andrea Révész
4. R. Ellis
5. R. Lyster
6. Masatoshi Sato
7. S. Loewen
8. N. Spada

In Language and Linguistics

1. Kazuya Saito
2. S. Montrul
3. Shaofeng Li
4. R. Lyster
5. R. Ellis
6. Andrea Révész
7. Masatoshi Sato
8. R. Dekeyser

Citations in the corpus

• ATTENTION, AWARENESS, AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING (2012, background): “These notions are in wide circulation, do not belong to me, and surface (not always with the same definitions) in numerous accounts of SLA in the past few decades, including but not limited to the exploration of basic issues of implicit and explicit learning in SLA (Hulstijn, 2003, 2005; N. Ellis, 1”
• COMPETENCE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN NATIVE AND NEAR-NATIVE SPEAKERS (2003, background): “Indeed, recent studies have found that variables such as L2 use (Birdsong & Molis, 2001), test modality (Bialystok & Miller, 1999), verbal ability (DeKeyser, 2000), and education (Flege, Yeni-Komshian, & Liu, 1999) are predictive of success in L2 acquisition.”
• Assessing bilingual dominance (2002, background): “…for differences in L2 performance between bilinguals and monolingual native speakers of the L2: the passing of a maturationally defined critical period (e.g., 2002 Cambridge University Press 0142-7164/02 $9.50 DeKeyser, 2000) and interlingual interference (e.g., Bialystok & Miller, 1998).”
• The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. (2007, positive): “In addition, sentence grammaticality judgment tasks were constructed on the basis of previous materials (Bedoya et al., 2005; DeKeyser, 2000; Johnson & Newport, 1989).”
• Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks (2019, background): “More seriously he also suggested that skill-acquisition theory is ‘most easily applicable’ to ‘the learning of simple structures’ (DeKeyser, 2015; 101) and that only learners with a high aptitude for language learning are able to master complex structures (DeKeyser, 2000).”
• Contrasting Effects of Starting Age and Input on the Oral Performance of Foreign Language Learners (2014, background): “This seminal study sets off a line of research that has featured prominently in the field of L2 acquisition up till the present time (e.g. DeKeyser 2000; Birdsong and Molis 2001; Abrahamsson and Hyltenstam 2008; DeKeyser et al. 2010; Granena and Long 2013).”
• Age of Onset and Nativelikeness in a Second Language: Listener Perception Versus Linguistic Scrutiny (2009, methodology): “Finally, in a replication with a subset of the J&N’89 sentences but with Hungarian learners of English and no native controls, DeKeyser (2000) identified 10 out of 42 late learners who scored within the range of child learners.”