Control Variables in Leadership Research: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review

By Jeremy B. Bernerth, Michael S. Cole, Erik C. Taylor, H. J. Walker. 2017

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8058c415d364db1b80155397be422ea41e1f7170

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Rolf van Dick
2. N. Junker
3. Herman Aguinis

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ravi S. Ramani
2. Nawaf Alabduljader
3. Julena M. Bonner
4. Matthew J. Quade
5. Benjamin D. McLarty
6. Rolf van Dick
7. Antonia J. Kaluza
8. N. Junker

Citations in the corpus

• When and how health‐oriented leadership relates to employee well‐being—The role of expectations, self‐care, and LMX (2021, result): “…et al., 2014) and because there was no strong theory for why the proposed associations should be influenced by other leader behaviors, we did not assess other leadership measures as control variables in our studies (following recommendations by Bernerth & Aguinis, 2016; Bernerth et al., 2018).”
• The influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality and employee bottom-line mentality on leader-member exchange and subsequent employee performance (2019, background): “Extant research on leadership has most commonly controlled for follower gender, organizational tenure, and age when studying LMX (Bernerth et al., 2018).”
• Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews (2020, background): “Anseel et al. (2010), Bernerth et al. (2018) Umbrella 1 (0.48) Integrates relevant evidence from multiple reviews to address a usually narrow methodology-related research question.”