The job crafting intervention: effects on job resources, self-efficacy, and affective well-being
By Machteld van den Heuvel, Evangelia Demerouti, Marianne Peeters. 2015
381 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c58ba98d93faa5321b29dba7172570959eedd77
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Rebecca J. Collie
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Ashlea Troth
- Sanna Malinen
- Jae Young Lee
- Yunsoo Lee
- Marjan Gorgievski
In General Health Professions
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Rebecca J. Collie
- D. Vîrgă
- Hans De Witte
- Marjan Gorgievski
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Jae Young Lee
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Marjan Gorgievski
- Evangelia Demerouti
- D. Vîrgă
- Jae Young Lee
- Rebecca J. Collie
- Yunsoo Lee
- Hans De Witte
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding Teacher Wellbeing Through Job Demands-Resources Theory (2020, background): “Another way of promoting self-awareness among employees, which may be effective for teachers is designing a personal demands/resources/tasks chart (van den Heuvel et al. 2015).”
- The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence (2019, methodology): “These findings extend previous job crafting intervention studies (Gordon et al., 2018; Van Den Heuvel et al., 2015; Van Wingerden et al., 2017a) and indicate that a Hawthorne effect cannot explain the effects of the intervention.”
- EMPLOYEE RESILIENCE: DIRECTIONS FOR RESILIENCE DEVELOPMENT (2017, background): “Jobs that provide a degree of decision-making discretion elicit positive performance and health outcomes through their effect on perceived control (e.g., Grzywacz, Casey, & Jones, 2007; van den Heuvel et al., 2015).”
- Effectiveness of job crafting interventions: a meta-analysis and utility analysis (2019, background): “Most were carried out in The Netherlands (n = 9; i.e., Dubbelt, 2016; Gordon et al., 2018; Kooij, Van Woerkom, & Kuijpers, 2018; Kooij et al., 2017; Van den Heuvel et al., 2015; Van Wingerden, Bakker, & Derks, 2016; Van Wingerden et al., 2017a, 2017b, 2017).”
- Job Crafting and Performance: Literature Review and Implications for Human Resource Development (2018, background): “In another quasi-experimental field study, this time with employees of a Dutch police district, Heuvel, Demerouti, and Peeters (2015) found that a job crafting intervention significantly increased employees’ self-efficacy and well-being.”
- From job crafting to home crafting: A daily diary study among six European countries (2020, background): “We already know that job crafting can be trained and that it has positive benefits for employees and organizations (Gordon et al., 2018; Van den Heuvel et al., 2015), and job crafting interventions (e.g. the Job Crafting ToolTM; Berg et al., 2013) are available for practitioners with the aim to…”
- Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: implications for employee well-being and performance (2018, positive): “Training employees to redesign their own jobs such that these jobs are better tailored to employees’ preferences and abilities (through job crafting trainings; Van den Heuvel et al., 2015; Van Wingerden et al., 2016) may complement top-down approaches and make them even more effective.”
- Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach (2017, background): “In line with research on other types of proactive work behavior, such as job crafting (e.g., Tims et al., 2014; Vogt et al., 2015) and organizational citizenship behaviors (e.g., Avey et al., 2011), our results indicate that pro-active strategic work behavior, in this study employee…”