An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness

By Kaye Alvarez, Eduardo Salas, C. Garofano. 2004

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a4fa1b15456ff490fda5a4b2a66adfce6b19371

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating Training Programs: Development and Correlates of the Questionnaire for Professional Training Evaluation (2013, methodology): “The Kirkpatrick scheme is a very popular and widely applied framework for summative evaluation (Blau et al., 2012), which also can be found in many other evaluation approaches (e.g. Alliger et al., 1997; Nickols, 2005; for an overview, see Alvarez et al., 2004).”
The Effects of Training Design, Individual Characteristics and Work Environment on Transfer of Training (2007, unknown): “…literature, there are several training design factors that influence transfer of training: instructional techniques and learning principles (e.g. Alvarez et al., 2004); self-management and relapse prevention strategies (e.g. Tziner et al., 1991; Wexley & Nemeroff, 1975) and goal setting (e.g.…”
Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers (2021, background): “Cognitive learning outcomes are associated with acquisition of knowledge [79], skill-based learning outcomes are concerned with the acquisition of technical or motor skills and attitudinal learning consists of aspects such as goals, motivation and attitude that are connected with the training progra”
A study of best practices in training transfer and proposed model of transfer (2008, background): “The first category captured primary influences on transfer by way of widely accepted models of transfer, including the subcategories of learner characteristics, intervention design/delivery, and work environment (Alvarez et al., 2004; Baldwin & Ford, 1988; Ford & Weissbein, 1997; Salas et al., 1999)”
Competence development in the workplace: concepts, strategies and effects (2008, result): “Although more recent research (e.g. Alvarez et al., 2004; Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2001) indicates that a number of advancements have been made during recent years, the conclusion made by Tannenbaum and Yukl (1992) is in many respects still valid.”