Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional values, international outlook
By J. Kennedy. 2002
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a27374268d5d4dba299d3ed9f0bd4c6eda8c1cc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams (2004, background): “For instance, in a collectivist culture like Malaysia where social harmony and hierarchical differences are valued, effective leadership is expected to be autocratic yet compassionate rather than participatory (Kennedy, 2002).”
- Leader‐member exchange and attitudinal outcomes: role of procedural justice climate (2007, background): “In other words, leading in Malaysia is leading hierarchical relationships (Ansari et al., 2004; Kennedy, 2002).”
- Ethical work climate, employee commitment and proactive customer service performance: Test of the mediating effects of organizational politics (2017, background): “Although they promote harmony in groups, managers implement reward systems that are favorable to certain employees at the expense of others (Kennedy, 2002).”
- Culturally‐linked leadership styles (2010, background): “Introduction Are leadership styles culturally-linked? What do leaders do to be effective in their cultures? Why is culture “the software of the mind?” While many leadership styles, attributes, traits and philosophies account for the extensive literature surrounding leadership (House et al., 2004; Ho”
- The relationship between leadership styles and organizational commitment in Malaysia: role of leader–member exchange (2010, background): “This is particularly true in a high power–distance country like Malaysia, as leading is a hierarchical relationship (Kennedy 2002, Ansari et al.2004) between subordinates who would tend to yield to superior authority and leaders who are expected to be paternalistic (Farh and Cheng 2000).”