Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees

By T. Begley, Cynthia Lee, Yongqing Fang, Jianfeng Li. 2002

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/778179b550bf469a9164b9a7a795ad4b7d8d1e09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis (2015, background): “As Begley et al. (2002) have shown, citizenship is boosted by procedural fairness to a greater extent for employees high in power distance.”
Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries (2006, background): “Notably, employees in cultures with higher power distance values will recognize that existing barriers should regulate attempts to form relationships with superiors (Begley et al., 2001).”
Culture's Impact on the Importance of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationships (2013, unknown): “Consequently, those “high in power distance see little value attempting to influence decision making” (Begley et al. 2002, p. 694).”
Who Cares about Justice? The Moderating Effect of Values on the Link between Organisational Justice and Work Behaviour (2006, background): “previous studies (Begley et al., 2002; Brockner et al., 2001; Farh et al., 1997; Lam et al., 2002; Lind et al., 1997) that found values moderated the effects of justice on work variables.”
Relationships between organizational justice, organizational trust and organizational commitment: a cross-cultural study of China, South Korea and Australia (2017, background): “…apply more to individuals with low-power distance has received considerable support, some argue that the effect may run in the opposite direction as individuals with high-power distance are likely to monitor distant authorities for potential exploitation (Begley et al., 2002; Fischer, 2013).”