The All‐or‐Nothing Workplace: Flexibility Stigma and “Opting Out” Among Professional‐Managerial Women

By P. Stone, Lisa Ackerly Hernandez. 2013

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers (2014, background): “Outside of academia, research on women managers shows that many opted out of their jobs when they encountered stigma relating to taking advantage of work–life arrangements (Stone & Hernandez, 2013).”
Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma (2013, background): “Instead, they buy into the time norms that ultimately cause them to become disillusioned with their careers and head home (Stone & Hernandez, 2013).”
“Family-Friendly” Jobs and Motherhood Pay Penalties: The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements Across the Educational Spectrum (2019, background): “The “career devotion schema,” which dictates that work should be an all-encompassing commitment (Blair-Loy, 2003; Stone & Hernandez, 2013), is especially common in professional and managerial jobs, and expectations of long hours are deeply embedded in organizational cultures (Cha & Weeden, 2014).”
Is Stereotype Threat a Useful Construct for Organizational Psychology Research and Practice? (2014, background): “In line with this suggestion, women who choose to work flexibly face stigmatizing treatment (P. Stone & Hernandez, 2013).”