Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK (2018, methodology): “Such work cultures are found to be the main culprit of why flexible working is stigmatised in the workplace (Cech and Blair-Loy 2014; Williams et al. 2013)—namely because flexible working for family purposes indicates a deviation away from such ideal worker norm.”
“Family-Friendly” Jobs and Motherhood Pay Penalties: The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements Across the Educational Spectrum (2019, methodology): “However, much previous research relies on qualitative or experimental designs (i.e., Blair-Loy 2003; Cech and Blair-Loy 2014; Cuddy et al. 2004; Cohen and Single 2001; Dodson 2013; Munsch 2016; Stone and Hernandez 2013), which tend to focus on mothers in specific jobs, workplaces, or industries,…”
Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities (2015, background): “…professional identities also include professionspecific content, this image is central to many professions’ expected identities, such as those of leveraged buyout investors (Turco 2010), academics (Cech and Blair-Loy 2014, Manchester et al. 2013), and executives and managers (Blair-Loy 2003).”