SOCIALIZATION TACTICS AND PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT
By Daniel M. Cable, C. Parsons. 2001
704 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71c021adee13e1949a3b0d352cb090ded997143f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Francesca Gino
- Arnold B. Bakker
- David G. Allen
- J. Edwards
- Corine Boon
- K. Ehrhart
- Deanne N. den Hartog
- A. Saks
In Gender Studies
- David G. Allen
- T. Bauer
- Arnold B. Bakker
- B. Erdogan
- Tomoki Sekiguchi
- J. Kammeyer-Mueller
- Blake E. Ashforth
- J. Edwards
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- A. Saks
- David G. Allen
- T. Bauer
- Osman M. Karatepe
- B. Erdogan
- Sharon K. Parker
- D. Kooij
Citations in the corpus
- The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: examining the role of person–organisation and person–job fit (2011, background): “J fit between newcomers and organisations (Cable and Parsons 2001; Cooper-Thomas, Van Vianen and Anderson 2004).”
- Reinterpreting Time in Fit Theory: Crafting and Recrafting Narratives of Fit in Medias Res (2011, background): “…Roberts & Robins, 2004; Saks & Ashforth, 1997); that examine the stability of fit effects over time (e.g., Chatman, 1991; Roberts & Robins, 2004; Taris & Feij, 2001); and that examine changes in fit from prehire to post-hire (e.g., Cable & Judge, 1997; Cable & Parsons, 2001; Saks & Ashforth, 2002).”
- When person‐organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover (2007, background): “) to socializing employees within the organization ( Cable and Parsons, 2001”
- Perceptions of HR practices, person–organisation fit, and affective commitment: The moderating role of career stage (2018, background): “This understanding helps to remove uncertainty and increases employees’ sense of community, and these effects are likely to result in a higher level of perceived fit (Cable & Parsons, 2001) and, in turn, higher affective commitment.”
- The Psychic Cost of Doing Wrong (2012, background): “The implications of socialization tactics for ethical behavior seem straightforward, because socialization is at least partially an attempt to create consistency between organizational values and individual values (Cable & Parsons, 2001; Kim et al., 2005).”
- Do Organizational Socialization Tactics Influence Newcomer Embeddedness and Turnover? (2006, methodology): “…organizational attachment and commitment, job satisfaction, social integration, role clarity, task mastery, values congruence, and fit, among others (e.g., Bauer & Green, 1998; Brett, Feldman, & Weingart, 1990; Cable & Parsons, 2001; Morrison, 1993a, 1993b; Wanberg & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2000).”
- Breaking Them in or Eliciting Their Best? Reframing Socialization around Newcomers’ Authentic Self-expression (2013, background): “…they are more likely to assume a ‘‘custodial’’ or ‘‘absorption’’ stance, accepting organizational values and norms as their own when experiencing highly institutionalized socialization tactics as opposed to more individualized tactics (e.g., Cable and Parsons, 2001; Kim, Cable, and Kim, 2005).”
- Getting to Know You (2017, neutral): “…tactics (Jones, 1986), which may have encouraged them to form a stronger social bond with each other, often linked to more positive organizational outcomes, including acceptance of organizational norms (Cable & Parsons, 2001) and positive work attitudes (Mignerey, Rubin, & Gorden, 1995).”
- Why Are Individuals Attracted to Organizations? (2005, background): “For instance, Cable and Parsons (2001) illustrated in a longitudinal field study that objective fit in terms of value congruence was related to subjective fit perceptions.”
- Person–organization fit, OCB and performance appraisal: Evidence from matched supervisor–salesperson data set in a Spanish context☆ (2008, background): “PO fit refers to employees' subjective beliefs about how well their personal values match the organizational culture (Cable & DeRue, 2002; Cable & Parsons, 2001; Kristof, 1996).”
- Values at Work: The Impact of Personal Values in Organisations (2019, background): “Researchers argued that socialisation can strengthen person-organisation fit, which in turn is expected to increase organisational commitment and decrease turnover (see a review in Cable & Parsons, 2001).”
- Navigating Uncharted Waters (2015, methodology): “Drawing on G. R. Jones’ (1986) typology, Cable and Parsons (2001) found support for the proposed “buckets” of tactics and found that they were related to socialization outcomes.”
- Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization? (2013, methodology): “In a similar study which also includes an assessment of pre-entry values congruence between applicants and organization, Cable and Parsons (2001) likewise demonstrated a positive association between fixed socialization activities and employees experiencing that their values match those of the…”