Dynamics of charismatic leadership: a process theory, simulation model, and tests

By C. Jacobsen, R. House. 2001

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/691ef66348edefdc155c24a34d30588600b39e52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Leader motives, charismatic leadership and subordinates' work attitude in the profit and voluntary sector (2005, background): “Many researchers concerned with charismatic leadership hold that personal characteristics or traits play an important role in the emergence of charismatic leadership (e.g., Bryman, 1992; Den Hartog & Koopman, 2001; Jacobsen & House, 2001; Judge & Bono, 2000).”
Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research (2006, methodology): “…endorse its use, we agree that it is best utilized along with other third discipline methods–including comparative case studies such as those used by Jacobsen and House (2001)–and its virtual world should continuously be informed by the findings of other methods (Hunt & Ropo, 2003; Ilgen & Hulin,…”
Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication (2010, background): “For example, although this conjecture is purely speculative, it may be that managers with high levels of charisma are better able to communicate with psychologically entitled employees than other managers owing to their likeability and persuasive abilities (e.g. Jacobsen and House, 2001).”
Linking the Big Five-Factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator (2005, background): “26, 839–865 (2005) Most researchers concerned with charismatic leadership attribute importance to personality in predicting leader behavior and effectiveness (Bryman, 1992; Den Hartog & Koopman, 2001; Jacobsen & House, 2001; Judge & Bono, 2000).”