Gender Differences in Reading Motivation: Does Sex or Gender Identity Provide a Better Account?.
By Sarah P. McGeown, Hannah Goodwin, N. Henderson, P. Wright. 2012
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/682a9fa6ade7a51be0a0927afcdfd702fbcdfbc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Marissa J. Filderman
- Mary J. York
- Minna Torppa
- D. Francis
- Amanda McClelland
- C. Wolters
- Carolyn A. Denton
- Peng Peng
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
- Mary J. York
- D. Francis
- C. Wolters
- Carolyn A. Denton
- Jessica R. Toste
- J. Reeve
- Shu-Shen Shih
- M. Bong
Citations in the corpus
- Why do boys and girls perform differently on PISA Reading in Finland? The effects of reading fluency, achievement behaviour, leisure reading and homework activity (2018, background): “These findings suggest that the discussion regarding the practical relevance of boy–girl differences in reading is just (e.g., Hyde & Linn, 1988; Jimenez et al., 2011; McGeown et al., 2012; Moll et al., 2014).”
- Adolescents’ motivation for reading: group differences and relation to standardized achievement (2014, background): “aspects of intrinsic motivation and value for reading than do adolescent boys (Baker & Wigfield, 1999; Lau, 2009a; McGeown et al., 2012; Mucherah & Yoder, 2008; Unrau & Schlackman, 2006; Wigfield et al., 2012).”
- A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relations Between Motivation and Reading Achievement for K–12 Students (2020, result): “In addition, some studies have reported contradictory findings when comparing students based on reading ability, with no significant group differences on measures of motivation (e.g., Lau & Chan, 2003; McGeown et al., 2012).”