”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously

By M. Bengtsson, Sören Kock. 2000

1,987 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Strategy and Management, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/658ed0485dc09257a8d2d63a0a4198983ab70aa3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

In Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Citations in the corpus

“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case (2019, background): “from both the separation principle that advocates for a temporal separation between cooperative actions and competitive actions (Ansari et al., 2016; Bengtsson and Kock, 2000; Bengtsson et al., 2016) and the integration principle that is built on the adoption of a “coopetitive mindset” (Bengtsson et”
Impact of Co-Opetition on Firm Competitive Behavior: An Empirical Examination (2006, background): “Scholars suggest that co-opetition is an intriguing phenomenon and deserves scholarly attention (Bengtsson & Kock, 2000; Ketchen et al., 2004; Lado et al., 1997), and the managerial trend shows increased tendency to form cooperative ties with competitors (Harbison & Pekar, 1998) and network-based…”
Co-opetition, distributor's entrepreneurial orientation and manufacturer's knowledge acquisition: Evidence from China (2011, background): “New advances in this domain indicate that the properties of a supply chain partnership can be best described as co-opetition (Bengtsson and Kock, 2000; Kotzab and Teller, 2003; Luo, 2007), defined as cooperation and competition simultaneously functioning between increasingly interdependent parties…”
Co‐opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model (2009, background): “The phenomenon of co-opetition, that is, simultaneous cooperation and competition between firms, has become increasingly popular in recent years (Gnyawali, He, and Madhavan 2008, 2006; Chen 2008; Luo 2007; Ketchen, Snow, and Hoover 2004; Bengtsson and Kock 2000).”
Research on Competitive Dynamics: Recent Accomplishments and Future Challenges (2004, background): “Bengtsson and Kock (2000) assert that the cooperation-competition tension should not be seen as dangerous. Instead, top management teams should understand and communicate to organizational members that cooperation and competition can exist simultaneously, and both can contribute to achieving organiz”
On characterizing the 4 C's in supply chain management (2005, background): “In the supply-chain context, competitors are more restrictively defined as “actors that produce and market the same product” (Bengtsson and Kock, 2000) and that operate at the same stage (e.g. two retailers).”
Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance (2014, background): “, Chen, 2008; Das & Teng, 2000) suggest that firms should balance the contradictory forces (i.e., competition and cooperation) in which tension from the paradox can lead to the most positive effects. For example, Das and Teng (2000) suggest that the balance between competition and cooperationwill in”
Production Coopetition Strategies for Competing Manufacturers that Produce Partially Substitutable Products (2019, background): “However, few studies have been conducted regarding coopetition, which is deﬁned as a dyadic relationship involving ﬁrms’ simultaneous engagement in competition and cooperation (Bengtsson and Kock 2000, Brandenburger and Nalebuff 1996).”
The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development (2019, background): “Here the first letter in each pair represent the expected payoff for Agent 1, and the second letter in each pair represents the payoff for Agent 2.41 38See Bengtsson and Kock (2000) and Tsai (2002).”