Conceptualizing Emergent States: A Strategy to Advance the Study of Group Dynamics

By Mary J. Waller, Gerardo A. Okhuysen, Marzieh Saghafian. 2016

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures (2017, background): “level phenomena, attitudes and behaviors (cf. Kozlowski & Chao, 2012; Waller et al., 2016).”
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021, background): “Two review studies (Peltoniemi, 2011; Williams et al., 2018) gave a rather detailed account of how they identified the seminal works, but the other three (Hopkinson & Blois, 2014; Jarzabkowski & Spee, 2009; Waller et al., 2016) only posited that the work they focused on was seminal.”
The Why and How of the Integrative Review (2020, methodology): “Such reviews explore a process (e.g., emergence, see Waller et al., 2016) or method (narrative analysis, see Vaara et al., 2016), the upshot of which is relevant to multiple communities of practice.”
Mapping 50 Years of Small Group Research Through Small Group Research (2020, background): “Group processes and development are still a major focus, which is beneficial given the naturally dynamic and longitudinal nature of groups (Waller et al., 2016).”
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2020, background): “(2005) to also include team emergent states, which tap qualities of the team that are affective or cognitive in nature (Marks et al., 2001; Waller et al., 2016).”