The Importance of Prior Knowledge When Comparing Examples: Influences on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Equation Solving
By Bethany Rittle-Johnson, Jon Star, Kelley Durkin. 2009
252 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6397e5cc4a75d74bd90e513ad519a1edb06b5e31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Bethany Rittle-Johnson
- Jon Star
- Lindsey E. Richland
- Michael Schneider
- Stephen K. Reed
- Kristie J. Newton
- Timothy J. Nokes-Malach
- S. Schukajlow
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Tamara van Gog
- Kristie J. Newton
- Bethany Rittle-Johnson
- Michael Schneider
- Timothy J. Nokes-Malach
- Nikol Rummel
- S. Schukajlow
- Jon Star
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of prompting multiple solutions for modelling problems on students’ performance (2015, background): “…for students with different levels of prior knowledge, but in other studies, students with better prior knowledge in the respective domain benefitted more than other students from presenting and comparing multiple solution methods (Große 2014; Reed et al. 2012; Rittle-Johnson et al. 2009, 2012).”
- Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives (2010, methodology): “comparing examples of different (representations of) solution methods (Große and Renkl 2006; Rittle-Johnson et al. 2009), or by using conceptually oriented equations rather than computationally oriented equations (e.”
- Developing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Mathematics (2015, methodology): “…knew one of the solution procedures at pre-test, comparing procedures supported greater procedural knowledge (Rittle-Johnson & Star, 2007; Rittle-Johnson, Star, & Durkin, 2009) or greater conceptual knowledge (Rittle-Johnson & Star, 2009; Rittle-Johnson et al., 2009; Star & Rittle-Johnson, 2009).”
- Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review (2013, methodology): “One last possibility is that the objective of the comparison could have been to find differences alone (e.g., Rittle-Johnson et al., 2009).”
- Understanding the Development of Flexibility in Struggling Algebra Students (2010, background): “However, research by Rittle-Johnson et al. (2009) suggests that some familiarity with a single approach is necessary before students can benefit from the comparison of multiple approaches, possibly because it eases the cognitive load necessary for comparison.”
- Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics (2012, background): “Rittle-Johnson, Star, and Durkin (2009) found that general algebraic knowledge about manipulating equations predicted whether students benefited at all from being taught through comparison between two solution strategies.”
- Learning by Mapping Across Situations (2012, background): “Rittle-Johnson et al. (2009) discovered that asking seventh- and eighth-grade students to compare two solutions for solving the same problem was helpful when they had the appropriate prior knowledge.”