Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review
By Louis Alfieri, Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, Christian D. Schunn. 2013
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab7b96f85550549565a2c7a01d875bb12c067e2b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Analogical Reasoning in the Classroom: Insights from Cognitive Science. (2015, background): “There is some evidence that stating the analogical principle after students have made the comparison is more effective than stating the principle in advance (Alfieri et al., 2011; Schwartz & Bransford, 1998).”
- Juxtapeer: Comparative Peer Review Yields Higher Quality Feedback and Promotes Deeper Reflection (2018, background): “Contrasting cases help develop nuanced understanding Across domains as diverse as algebra [39], design [12,49], and management [47], learners benefit from articulating the similarities and differences between examples [1].”
- The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes (2020, background): “While comparison researchers offer some suggestions about instructions, these are quite limited and only relate to analogical comparisons (e.g. Alfieri, Nokes-Malach, and Schunn 2013).”