Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines.
By Torsten Biemann, Michael S. Cole, S. Voelpel ‡. 2012
372 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61c2775ba94c5ea4ab197aefa37237b2ab1f99d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Neuza Ribeiro
- Arménio Rego
- Miguel Pina e Cunha
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Susana Leal
- Andreia Vitória
- Ana L. Magalhães
- Lurdes Gonçalves
In Strategy and Management
- Neuza Ribeiro
- Susana Leal
- Ines Herrero
- Bradley P. Owens
- Dongkyu Kim
- Arménio Rego
- Miguel Pina e Cunha
- Christian Vandenberghe
Citations in the corpus
- Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? ☆ ☆☆ (2013, methodology): “…higher than the cutoff value of 0.60 suggested by some authors (Michel et al., 2011; Zellmer-Bruhn, 2003), three being higher and one being close to the cutoff value of 0.70 suggested by other authors (Avolio, Gardner, Walumbwa, Luthans, & May, 2004; Biemann et al., 2012; LeBreton & Senter, 2008).”
- How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: a moderated mediation model (2017, background): “…and coordinative dynamics, behavior modeling, social and emotional contagion, and mental-model convergence) team members develop similar perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs that mutually reinforce sentiments, attitudes, and beliefs about team capacities (Biemann et al., 2012; Dawkins et al., 2015).”
- Environmentally specific transformational leadership and team pro-environmental behaviors: The roles of pro-environmental goal clarity, pro-environmental harmonious passion, and power distance (2020, methodology): “…the homogeneity of the members’ rating scores within a team and justify the aggregation of the measures at the group level, we used the tool developed by Biemann et al. (2012) to calculate the within-group interrater reliability statistic (Rwg) and intraclass correlations (ICC(1) and ICC(2)).”
- Justifying Aggregation With Consensus-Based Constructs (2015, methodology): “, ICC values) are representative of all units (Biemann et al., 2012; Woehr et al., 2015).”