A comparison of the digestibility of a range of lupin and soybean protein products when fed to either Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) or rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

By B. Glencross, C. Carter, N. Duijster, David R. Evans, K. Dods, P. McCafferty, Wayne Hawkins, R. Maas, S. Sipsas. 2004

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fe09796b9b6ae164fabd1d2dd86134a7f753808

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. F. Barrows
2. T. Gaylord
3. B. Glencross
4. S. Rawles
5. R. Waagbø
6. J. Bell
7. R. Hardy
8. G. Burr

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Hardy
2. J. Bell
3. B. Glencross
4. D. Tocher

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Hardy
2. F. Barrows
3. J. Bell
4. B. Glencross
5. A. Dumas
6. D. Bureau

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of fish meal quality and fish meal substitution by animal protein blend on growth performance, flesh quality and liver histology of Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus) (2013, background): “Glencross et al. (2004) reported that small lipid droplet formation in the liver of rainbow trout was observed, which may in part be related to the poorer energy retention of a diet that included high levels of yellow lupin kernel meal.”
• A feed is still only as good as its ingredients: An update on the nutritional research strategies for the optimal evaluation of ingredients for aquaculture feeds (2020, background): “The assessment of the digestibility of nutrients and energy from diets and ingredients provides one of the clearest ways of unambiguously defining the nutritional value of an ingredient to an animal (Aslaksen et al., 2007; Glencross et al., 2004; 2007; Sugiura, Dong, Rathbone, & Hardy, 1998).”
• Safe and Nutritious Aquaculture Produce: Benefits and Risks of Alternative Sustainable Aquafeeds (2008, background): “Generally, despite lower protein content, lower levels of some essential amino acids and the presence of anti-nutritional factors, replacement of around 30% of fish meal can be achieved without loss of growth performance, depending on the degree of product refinement (Teskeredzic et al. 1995; Medale”
• Replacing fishmeal with blends of alternative proteins on growth performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and early or late stage juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (2012, background): “Protein digestibility of most plant proteins for salmon is generally similar to or higher than that of fishmeal; except for bacterial protein meal, extracted soybean, oat, rapeseed (canola), and sunflower meals (Storebakken et al., 2000; Glencross et al., 2004; Aas et al., 2006; Refstie et al., 2006”
• A review of processing of feed ingredients to enhance diet digestibility in finfish (2007, background): “Hajen et al. (1993) reported that chinook salmon fed either SBM or SPI prepared by aqueous extraction had decreased feed consumption and growth.”
• Increasing dietary plant proteins affects growth performance and ammonia excretion but not digestibility and gut histology in turbot (Psetta maxima) juveniles (2011, background): “On the other hand, the use of soybean products may pose a series of problems that may affect palatability (Rackis, 1974), protein digestibility (Glencross et al., 2004) and may reduce feed utilization.”
• Apparent Digestibility of Gross Nutrients from Feedstuffs in Extruded Feeds for Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (2008, background): “Glencross et al. (2004, 2005) reported protein digestibility values of 98–107% for soy protein concentrate (SPC) and 98% for soy protein isolate in two trials with rainbow trout.”