Job strain and rumination about work issues during leisure time: A diary study

By M. Cropley, Lynne Millward Purvis. 2003

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dfa1ea091019f2868233b703588f4c8191078b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. (2006, background): “Cropley & Millward Purvis (76) found that teachers in high-strain jobs ruminated more about their work during evening hours than teachers in lowstrain jobs did.”
Work-Family Conflict, Enrichment, and Balance under “Levels” and “Episodes” Approaches (2011, methodology): “In more recent experience-sampling studies, Cropley and Purvis (2003) found that teachers experiencing high strain during the work day took longer to unwind, reported less personal control over what they were doing in the evening, and ruminated more about work-related issues than those experiencing ”
Leisure as a coping resource: A test of the job demand-control-support model (2009, background): “Others have found that individuals in ‘high strain’ jobs may find leisure is less effective (Cropley & Millward-Purvis, 2003), but it has also been reported that the greater one’s stress, the more important leisure becomes as a coping resource (Trenberth & Dewe, 2002).”
Recovery from job stress: The stressor‐detachment model as an integrative framework (2015, methodology): “For example, using a between-person design, Cropley and Purvis found that employees in a high-strain group (high demands and low job control) reported more ruminative thoughts than employees in a low-strain group. Similarly, von Thiele Schwarz (2011) showed that job demands were associated with the ”
The role of partners for employees' recovery during the weekend (2012, background): “A study on work-related rumination showed that people were less occupied by work-related issues when they were in company of other people than when they were alone (Cropley & Millward Purvis, 2003).”
How do individuals ‘switch‐off’ from work during leisure? A qualitative description of the unwinding process in high and low ruminators (2009, background): “For instance, studies have shown that individuals reporting high demands and low control at work, ruminate more about work issues during their leisure time and take longer to unwind during the evening, compared to workers reporting low demands and high control at work (Cropley & Millward Purvis, 20”
Rumination for innovation? Analysing the longitudinal effects of work-related rumination on creativity at work and off-job recovery (2017, background): “Second, research on work-related rumination has so far mainly been based on cross-sectional (Berset, Elfering, Lüthy, Lüthi, & Semmer, 2011; Querstret & Cropley, 2012) or diary studies focusing on short-term effects (Cropley & Purvis, 2003; Vahle-Hinz et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2013).”
Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy (2006, background): “ Cropley and Millward Purvis (2003) examined the degree of rumination about job-related issues among school teachers between 5 p.m.”
Job strain, work rumination, and sleep in school teachers (2006, background): “Occupational induced stress can often spill over into nonwork time and high job strain individuals in particular have been found to demonstrate delayed psychological and physiological recovery following work (Cropley & Millward Purvis, 2003 ; Rau, Georgiades, Fredrikson, Lemne, & de Faire, 2001 ; ”
The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. (2007, background): “Empirical evidence suggests that stressful job situations are negatively related to psychological detachment from work during off-job time (Cropley & Purvis, 2003; Grebner, Semmer, & Elfering, 2005).”
It’s the little things: exploring the importance of commonplace events for early‐career teachers’ motivation (2009, unknown): “work‐related thoughts) over a fixed time frame’ (Cropley & Millward Purvis, 2003 , p.”
Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011, unknown): “We based this view on the fact that exposure to high job demands (eg, high work load) may increase the risk that a person ruminates about his or her work after the working day is over (see Cropley & Purvis, 2003 ), which means that he or she has difficulties in psychological detachment from work.”