The Impact of Job Characteristics on Correctional Staff Members

By E. Lambert. 2004

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5726c12d320db6e9ebf5688a8d8f8137c9a1e14e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Effect Of Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction And Employee-Supervisor Relationship On Job Performance And Organizational Commitment (2016, background): “Job satisfaction refers to the extent that the working environment meets the needs and values of employees and the individual’s response to that environment (Lambert, 2004; Tewksbury & Higgins, 2006).”
Prison staff and work stress: The role of organizational and emotional influences (2006, background): “However, contrary to Savicki et al. (2003), in Canada female staff reported higher levels of organizational commitment, as did those with longer tenure of service and those who perceived the organization as "open and flexible." Important influences on organizational commitment also include perceptio”
Wanting Change: The Relationship of Perceptions of Organizational Innovation With Correctional Staff Job Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment (2010, methodology): “…the stress for correctional staff and allow staff to form more positive views of their jobs and to bond with the organization (Blevins, Cullen, Frank, Sundt, & Holmes, 2006; Cullen et al., 1985; Griffin, 2001, 2006; Grossi et al., 1996; Jurik & Winn, 1987; Lambert, 2004; Van Voorhis et al., 1991).”
Exploring Antecedents of Five Types of Organizational Commitment Among Correctional Staff (2008, background): “Distributive justice, family on work conflict, perceived dangerousness of the job, and job variety all had no significant association with affective commitment among the Midwestern correctional staff (Hogan et al., 2006; Lambert, 2003, 2004).”
The relationship among distributive and procedural justice and correctional life satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent: An exploratory study (2010, unknown): “…input into decision-making, integration, instrumental communication, and formalization are associated with organizational commitment (Griffin&Hepburn, 2005; Lambert, 2004; Lambert, Barton, et al., 2002; Lambert, Hogan, Paoline, & Clarke, 2005; Stohr et al., 1994; K. Wright et al., 1997).”
The impact of work–family conflict on correctional staff (2006, background): “Job stress is generally defined in the correctional literature as an employee’s feelings of job-related hardness, tension, anxiety, frustration, worry, emotional exhaustion and distress (Grossi et al., 1996; Armstrong and Griffin, 2004; Lambert, 2004).”
Gender and Stress (2006, background): “Studies spanning a myriad of occupations and organizations have identified both the sources of job-related stress as well as the often negative behavioral outcomes associated with high levels of stress (Grossi, Keil, & Vito, 1996; Lambert, 2004; Lambert, Edwards, Camp, & Saylor, 2005; Moon & Maxwell”
Correlates of correctional officer job stress: The impact of organizational structure (2006, background): “Furthermore, from a management standpoint, job stress has been found to negatively impact the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of correctional workers ( Lambert, 2004; Van Voorhis, Cullen, Link, & Wolfe, 1991) and has been linked to turnover intent (Dowden & Tellier, 2004; Slate & Vog”
The Influence of Individual, Job, and Organizational Characteristics on Correctional Staff Job Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment (2008, background): “Three prominent occupational attitudes identified are job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment (Byrd, Cochran, Silverman, & Blount, 2000; Dowden & Tellier, 2004; Griffin, 2001; Hepburn & Knepper, 1993; Lambert, 2004; Lambert, Hogan, & Barton, 1999; Lambert, Hogan, & Barton, 2002b;”
The Importance of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Shaping Turnover Intent (2009, background): “…variables that influence the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of correctional workers (Cullen et al., 1985; Hepburn & Knepper, 1993; Lambert, 2003, 2004; Lambert et al., 2002a, 2002b, 2004; Lambert & Paoline, 2005; Stohr et al., 1994; Van Voorhis et al., 1991; Wright et al., 1997).”
Social support's relationship to correctional staff job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment (2016, background): “Supervisory support is associated with lower ob stress and increased job satisfaction and organizational ommitment of correctional staff (Cullen et al., 1985; rossi, Keil, & Vito, 1996; Lambert, 2004; Lambert & ogan, 2009; Van Voorhis, Cullen, Link, & Wolfe, 1991).”
Doing “People Work” in the Prison Setting (2012, background): “Furthermore, job variety, supervision, and organizational support have been reported to be positively linked with correctional staff organizational commitment (Griffin & Hepburn, 2005; Lambert, 2004; Lambert et al., 2009).”
The Impact of Occupational Stressors on Correctional Staff Organizational Commitment (2006, methodology): “The data for the Lambert (2004) study are from the same survey with the same control variables (i.”